Ann Rheum Dis

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van den Hoogen, H. J M
Right arrow Articles by Devillé, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van den Hoogen, H. J M
Right arrow Articles by Devillé, W.
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Article
Ann Rheum Dis 1998;57:13-19 ( January )

Extended reports

On the course of low back pain in general practice: a one year follow up study Hans J M van den Hoogen,a Bart W Koes,a Jacques Th M van Eijk,a Lex M Bouter,a Walter Devilléa

a The Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, b Faculty of Medicine, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Correspondence to: Dr H van den Hoogen, EMGO Institute, Vrije Universiteit, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Accepted for publication 18 September 1997

OBJECTIVES---Knowledge on the clinical course of low back pain presented in general practice is poor. Preceding studies offer a fragmentary view only, whereas further knowledge is important to enable the assessment of the prognosis. The object of this study is to investigate the course of low back pain presented in general practice to enable the assessment of the prognosis.
METHODS---A one year follow up study on the clinical course of low back pain in consecutive cases receiving usual care in general practice. During a period of two years 15 general practitioners from Amsterdam and surrounding areas included consecutive patients with both chronic and recent onset low back pain. After the initial visit, each patient was monitored for a period of 12 months. The follow up consisted of monthly postal questionnaires on the course of the low back pain and the related disability.
RESULTS---A total of 443 of 605 patients identified were included in the follow up, which was fully completed by 269 patients. In general, patients with less serious low back pain participated less often or did not complete the follow up. At 12 weeks 35% and at the end of the follow up 10% of the population, respectively, still suffered from low back pain. Both the pain and the disability seemed to diminish quickly after the initial visit, and both seemed to stabilise at a lower level if the low back pain did not disappear completely. About three of four patients, whose pain disappeared before the end of the follow up, endured one or more relapses within a year. The median time to a relapse was about seven weeks, and its median duration about six weeks. Both the pain and the disability turned out to be less severe during relapses. The median time to recovery for patients whose low back pain developed more than seven weeks before the initial visit, was four weeks longer than for patients with more recently developed low back pain at the initial visit.
CONCLUSIONS---The clinical course of low back pain presented in general practice, for the most patients, clearly is less favourable than expected. It takes more than just a few weeks to recover, and relapses occur within a year in most cases. Fortunately, both the pain and the disability quickly diminish, even if the low back pain does not resolve within a few weeks.

Keywords: backache; prognosis; follow up study; general practice


© 1998 by Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

Relevant Article

Low back pain: an intermittent and remittent predicament of life
NORTIN M HADLER and TIMOTHY S CAREY
Ann Rheum Dis 1998 57: 1-2. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
F. H. Shen, D. Samartzis, and G. B.J. Andersson
Nonsurgical Management of Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., August 1, 2006; 14(8): 477 - 487.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
B W Koes, M W van Tulder, and S Thomas
Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain.
BMJ, June 17, 2006; 332(7555): 1430 - 1434.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
K. M. Dunn, K. Jordan, and P. R. Croft
Characterizing the Course of Low Back Pain: A Latent Class Analysis
Am. J. Epidemiol., April 15, 2006; 163(8): 754 - 761.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
M. Davidson and J. L Keating
A Comparison of Five Low Back Disability Questionnaires: Reliability and Responsiveness
Physical Therapy, January 1, 2002; 82(1): 8 - 24.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
R. Wernick and S. M. Campbell
Update in Rheumatology
Ann Intern Med, January 18, 2000; 132(2): 125 - 133.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
E. Thomas, A. J Silman, P. R Croft, A. C Papageorgiou, M. I V Jayson, and G. J Macfarlane
Predicting who develops chronic low back pain in primary care: a prospective study
BMJ, June 19, 1999; 318(7199): 1662 - 1667.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
R. Haigh and A. K Clarke
Effectiveness of rehabilitation for spinal pain
Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 1999; 13(1_suppl): 63 - 81.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
N. M HADLER and T. S CAREY
Low back pain: an intermittent and remittent predicament of life
Ann Rheum Dis, January 1, 1998; 57(1): 1 - 2.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 1998 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & European League Against Rheumatism