|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Rheumatology
and Rehabilitation Research Unit, University of Leeds, 36 Clarendon
Road, Leeds LS2 9NZ
Correspondence to: Dr Seedhom.
Accepted for publication 10 September 1998
OBJECTIVES
(a) To
determine the topographical variations in cartilage thickness over the
entire surfaces of cadaveric lower limb joints, and (b) to examine the
correlations between: cartilage thickness and its site specific
modulus; cartilage thickness and donor age, weight, height, and body
mass index.
METHODS
The cartilage
thickness of 11 sets of cadaveric human joints each comprising an
ankle, knee, and hip was measured using a needle probe technique.
Statistical analysis was used to compare the cartilage thickness of the
different lower limb joints and the differences in cartilage thickness
over the surface of individual joints. It was further examined whether
cartilage had a correlation with its stiffness, and any of the details
of the specimen donors such as age, weight, height, and body mass index.
RESULTS
The mean
cartilage thickness of the knee was significantly greater than that of
the ankle and hip (p<0.001) in all 11 sets of joints, while the
cartilage thickness of the hip was significantly greater than that of
the ankle in 10 sets of joints (p<0.001). The mass of specimen donors
was found to correlate with the mean cartilage thickness of all three
lower limb joints. A correlation was also found between the height of
donors and the mean cartilage thickness of the knee and hip joints,
while only in the ankle joint was a correlation found between the mean
cartilage thickness and the body mass index of the specimen donors. A
further correlation was found between cartilage thickness and its
modulus; the thinner the cartilage, the higher the modulus.
CONCLUSIONS
The
thickness of articular cartilage seems to be related to the congruance
of a joint; thin cartilage is found in congruent joints such as the
ankle, whereas thick cartilage is found in incongruent joints such as
the knee. The correlations in this study imply that the larger and
heavier was a donor the thicker was the cartilage in the lower limb
joints. The data further suggest the presence of an inverse relation
between the mean cartilage thickness and mean compressive modulus in
each of the joints examined.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. T. Bingham, R. Papannagari, S. K. Van de Velde, C. Gross, T. J. Gill, D. T. Felson, H. E. Rubash, and G. Li In vivo cartilage contact deformation in the healthy human tibiofemoral joint Rheumatology, November 1, 2008; 47(11): 1622 - 1627. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E. Anderson, B. J. Ellis, C. L. Peters, and J. A. Weiss Cartilage Thickness: Factors Influencing Multidetector CT Measurements in a Phantom Study Radiology, January 1, 2008; 246(1): 133 - 141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Wyler, V. Bousson, C. Bergot, M. Polivka, E. Leveque, E. Vicaut, and J.-D. Laredo Hyaline Cartilage Thickness in Radiographically Normal Cadaveric Hips: Comparison of Spiral CT Arthrographic and Macroscopic Measurements Radiology, February 1, 2007; 242(2): 441 - 449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. H. Borazjani, A. C. Chen, W. C. Bae, S. Patil, R. L. Sah, G. S. Firestein, and W. D. Bugbee Effect of Impact on Chondrocyte Viability During Insertion of Human Osteochondral Grafts J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2006; 88(9): 1934 - 1943. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. R. Knuesel, C. W. A. Pfirrmann, H. P. Noetzli, C. Dora, M. Zanetti, J. Hodler, B. Kuehn, and M. R. Schmid MR Arthrography of the Hip: Diagnostic Performance of a Dedicated Water-Excitation 3D Double-Echo Steady-State Sequence to Detect Cartilage Lesions Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2004; 183(6): 1729 - 1735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Y. El-Khoury, K. J. Alliman, H. J. Lundberg, M. J. Rudert, T. D. Brown, and C. L. Saltzman Cartilage Thickness in Cadaveric Ankles: Measurement with Double-Contrast Multi-Detector Row CT Arthrography versus MR Imaging Radiology, December 1, 2004; 233(3): 768 - 773. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H. Thomas and T. R. Daniels Ankle Arthritis J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 2003; 85(5): 923 - 936. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E M Hay, E Thomas, S M Paterson, K Dziedzic, and P R Croft A pragmatic randomised controlled trial of local corticosteroid injection and physiotherapy for the treatment of new episodes of unilateral shoulder pain in primary care Ann Rheum Dis, May 1, 2003; 62(5): 394 - 399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Schmid, H. P. Notzli, M. Zanetti, T. F. Wyss, and J. Hodler Cartilage Lesions in the Hip: Diagnostic Effectiveness of MR Arthrography Radiology, February 1, 2003; 226(2): 382 - 386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. R. Ferrell, P. V. Balint, and R. D. Sturrock Novel use of laser Doppler imaging for investigating epicondylitis Rheumatology, November 1, 2000; 39(11): 1214 - 1217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |