Ann Rheum Dis

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van der Heijden, G. J M G
Right arrow Articles by Knipschild, P. G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van der Heijden, G. J M G
Right arrow Articles by Knipschild, P. G
Ann Rheum Dis 1999;58:530-540 ( September )

Extended report

No effect of bipolar interferential electrotherapy and pulsed ultrasound for soft tissue shoulder disorders: a randomised controlled trial Geert J M G van der Heijdena b, Pieter Leffersb c, Pieter J M C Woltersd, José J D Verheijden, Henk van Mamerenb e, Jo P Houbend, Lex M Bouterb f, Paul G Knipschildb c

a Institute for Rehabilitation Research, Hoensbroek, the Netherlands, b Netherlands School of Primary Care Research, c Department of Epidemiology, University Maastricht, the Netherlands, d Hogeschool Limburg, Faculty of Health, School for Physiotherapy, Heerlen, the Netherlands, e Department of Anatomy and Embryology, University Maastricht, the Netherlands, f Institute for Research in Extramural medicine, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Correspondence to: Dr G J M G van der Heijden, iRv, Institute for Rehabilitation Research, PO Box 192, 6430 AD Hoensbroek, the Netherlands.

Accepted for publication 22 March 1999

OBJECTIVE---To assess the efficacy of bipolar interferential electrotherapy (ET) and pulsed ultrasound (US) as adjuvants to exercise therapy for soft tissue shoulder disorders (SD).
METHODS---Randomised placebo controlled trial with a two by two factorial design plus an additional control group in 17 primary care physiotherapy practices in the south of the Netherlands. Patients with shoulder pain and/or restricted shoulder mobility, because of a soft tissue impairment without underlying specific or generalised condition, were enrolled if they had not recovered after six sessions of exercise therapy in two weeks. They were randomised to receive (1) active ET plus active US; (2) active ET plus dummy US; (3) dummy ET plus active US; (4) dummy ET plus dummy US; or (5) no adjuvants. Additionally, they received a maximum of 12 sessions of exercise therapy in six weeks. Measurements at baseline, 6 weeks and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months later were blinded for treatment. Outcome measures: recovery, functional status, chief complaint, pain, clinical status, and range of motion.
RESULTS---After written informed consent 180 patients were randomised: both the active treatments were given to 73 patients, both the dummy treatments to 72 patients, and 35 patients received no adjuvants. Prognosis of groups appeared similar at baseline. Blinding was successfully maintained. At six weeks seven patients (20%) without adjuvants reported very large improvement (including complete recovery), 17 (23%) and 16 (22%) with active and dummy ET, and 19 (26%) and 14 (19%) with active and dummy US. These proportions increased to about 40% at three months, but remained virtually stable thereafter. Up to 12 months follow up the 95% CI for differences between groups for all outcomes include zero.
CONCLUSION---Neither ET nor US prove to be effective as adjuvants to exercise therapy for soft tissue SD.


© 1999 by Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
P. Jellema, D. A W M van der Windt, H. E van der Horst, J. W R Twisk, W. A B Stalman, and L. M Bouter
Should treatment of (sub)acute low back pain be aimed at psychosocial prognostic factors? Cluster randomised clinical trial in general practice
BMJ, July 9, 2005; 331(7508): 84.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
Y. K. Gursel, Y. Ulus, A. Bilgic, G. Dincer, and G. J. van der Heijden
Adding Ultrasound in the Management of Soft Tissue Disorders of the Shoulder: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial
Physical Therapy, April 1, 2004; 84(4): 336 - 343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
Philadelphia Panel Members, Clinical Specialty Experts, J. Albright, R. Allman, R. P. Bonfiglio, A. Conill, B. Dobkin, A. A Guccione, S. Hasson, R. Russo, et al.
Philadelphia Panel Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines on Selected Rehabilitation Interventions for Shoulder Pain
Physical Therapy, October 1, 2001; 81(10): 1719 - 1730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
V. J Robertson and K. G Baker
A Review of Therapeutic Ultrasound: Effectiveness Studies
Physical Therapy, July 1, 2001; 81(7): 1339 - 1350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
P. F. White, S. Li, and J. W. Chiu
Electroanalgesia: Its Role in Acute and Chronic Pain Management
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2001; 92(2): 505 - 513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 1999 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & European League Against Rheumatism