Ann Rheum Dis

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cockerill, W
Right arrow Articles by O'Neill, T W
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cockerill, W
Right arrow Articles by O'Neill, T W
Ann Rheum Dis 2000;59:368-371 ( May )

Extended report

Does location of vertebral deformity within the spine influence back pain and disability? W Cockerilla, A A Ismaila, C Cooperb, C Matthisc, H Raspec, A J Silmana, T W O'Neilla, and the European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study (EVOS) Group*

a ARC Epidemiology Research Unit, University of Manchester, Stopford Building, Manchester M13 9PT, b MRC Environmental Epidemiology Unit, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, c Institute for Social Medicine, Medical University of Lubeck, Lubeck, Germany

Correspondence to: Dr O'Neill

Accepted for publication 10 December 1999

OBJECTIVE---Vertebral deformity is associated with back pain and disability. The aim of this analysis was to determine whether location within the spine influences the strength of association between vertebral deformity, back pain and disability.
METHODS---Men and women aged 50 years and over were recruited from population registers in 30 European centres. Subjects were invited for an interviewer administered questionnaire, and for lateral spinal radiographs. The questionnaire included questions about back pain, general health and functional ability. The spinal radiographs were evaluated morphometrically and vertebral deformity defined according to the McCloskey-Kanis method.
RESULTS---756 (11.7%) men and 885 (11.8%) women had evidence of one or more vertebral deformities. Among women with a single deformity, after adjusting for age and centre, those with a lumbar deformity were more likely than those with a thoracic deformity to report back pain, both currently (OR=1.4; 95% CI 1.0, 2.0) and in the past year (OR=1.5; 95% CI 1.0, 2.3). No association was observed in men. Among women with two deformities, those with adjacent deformities were more likely than those with non-adjacent deformities to report poor general health (OR=2.2; 95%CI 0.9, 5.6), impaired functional ability (OR=1.9; 95%CI 0.8, 4.7) and current back pain (OR=2.1; 95%CI 0.9, 4.9), though none of these associations were statistically significant. By contrast, among men, non-adjacent deformities were associated with impaired functional ability compared with those with adjacent deformities.
CONCLUSION---Location within the spine influences the strength of association between self reported health factors and vertebral deformity.


* Members of the EVOS Group are shown at the end of the article.


© 2000 by Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2000 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & European League Against Rheumatism