|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
a Department of
Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Centre, PO Box
85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands, b Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Sint
Jansdal, PO Box 138, 3840 AC Harderwijk, The Netherlands, c Department of Rheumatology,
Hospital Hilversum, PO Box 10016, 1201 DA Hilversum, The
Netherlands, d Department
of Rheumatology, Eemland Hospital, PO Box 1502, 3800 MB Amersfoort,
The Netherlands, e Department of Rheumatology, Sint
Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM Nieuwegein, The
Netherlands, f Department of Rheumatology, Diakonessen
Hospital, Bosboomstraat 1, 3582 KE Utrecht, The Netherlands
Correspondence to: Dr Jacobs Email: J.W.J.Bijlsma{at}DIGD.AZU.NL
Accepted for publication 12 January 2000
OBJECTIVES
To compare
three therapeutic strategies using slow acting antirheumatic drugs
(SAARDs) in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA), for their disease
modifying properties, toxicity, and lag time until treatment effect.
METHODS
Patients with
recent onset RA from six hospitals were randomly assigned to immediate
initiation of one of three treatment strategies: (I) a "mild SAARD
with a long lag time" (hydroxychloroquine, if necessary replaced by
auranofin); (II) a "potent SAARD with a long lag time"
(intramuscular gold, if necessary replaced by D-penicillamine); (III) a "potent SAARD with a short lag
time" (methotrexate, if necessary replaced by sulfasalazine).
Comparisons included two years of follow up.
RESULTS
All
SAARD strategies reduced mean disease activity. A greater percentage of
patients improved clinically with strategies II and III than with
strategy I: percentages of patients improved on joint score with
strategies II and III (79% and 82%, respectively), which was
statistically different from strategy I (66%). The same was true for
remission percentages: 31% and 24% v 16%,
respectively). Longitudinal analysis showed significantly less
disability with strategy III, and a lower erythrocyte sedimentation
rate with strategy II than with strategy I. In addition, radiological
damage after one and two years, was significantly lower in strategies II and III (at two years median scores were 11 and 10 v 14 in strategy I, p<0.05). Toxicity was
increased in strategy II compared with the other strategies.
CONCLUSION
Strategy
III, comprising methotrexate or sulfasalazine, produced the best
results weighing effectiveness and toxicity. Strategy I
(hydroxychloroquine or auranofin) was slightly less effective, and
strategy II (intramuscular gold or D-penicillamine) was
associated with increased toxicity.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S M M Verstappen, J W G Jacobs, M J van der Veen, A H M Heurkens, Y Schenk, E J ter Borg, A A M Blaauw, J W J Bijlsma, and on the behalf of the Utrecht Rheumatoid Arthritis Intensive treatment with methotrexate in early rheumatoid arthritis: aiming for remission. Computer Assisted Management in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis (CAMERA, an open-label strategy trial) Ann Rheum Dis, November 1, 2007; 66(11): 1443 - 1449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Baron, I. Boutron, B. Giraudeau, and P. Ravaud Reporting of radiographic methods in randomised controlled trials assessing structural outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis Ann Rheum Dis, May 1, 2007; 66(5): 651 - 657. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S M M Verstappen, J N Hoes, E J ter Borg, J W J Bijlsma, A A M Blaauw, G A van Albada-Kuipers, C van Booma-Frankfort, J W G Jacobs, and on behalf of the Utrecht Rheumatoid Arthritis Coho Joint surgery in the Utrecht Rheumatoid Arthritis Cohort: the effect of treatment strategy Ann Rheum Dis, November 1, 2006; 65(11): 1506 - 1511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. M. Verstappen, A. Boonen, J. W. J. Bijlsma, E. Buskens, H. Verkleij, Y. Schenk, G. A. van Albada-Kuipers, D. M. Hofman, J. W. G. Jacobson, and on behalf of the Utrecht Rheumatoid Arthritis Coho Working status among Dutch patients with rheumatoid arthritis: work disability and working conditions Rheumatology, February 1, 2005; 44(2): 202 - 206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S M M Verstappen, G A van Albada-Kuipers, J W J Bijlsma, A A M Blaauw, Y Schenk, H C M Haanen, J W G Jacobs, and on behalf of the Utrecht Rheumatoid Arthritis Coho A good response to early DMARD treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the first year predicts remission during follow up Ann Rheum Dis, January 1, 2005; 64(1): 38 - 43. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S M M Verstappen, H Verkleij, J W J Bijlsma, E Buskens, A A Kruize, A H M Heurkens, M J van der Veen, and J W G Jacobs Determinants of direct costs in Dutch rheumatoid arthritis patients Ann Rheum Dis, July 1, 2004; 63(7): 817 - 824. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D Aletaha, G Eberl, V P K Nell, K P Machold, and J S Smolen Practical progress in realisation of early diagnosis and treatment of patients with suspected rheumatoid arthritis: results from two matched questionnaires within three years Ann Rheum Dis, July 1, 2002; 61(7): 630 - 634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C Hood, J Johnson, and C Kelly What is the prevalence of rheumatic disorders in general medical inpatients? Postgrad. Med. J., December 1, 2001; 77(914): 774 - 777. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Quinn, P. G. Conaghan, and P. Emery The therapeutic approach of early intervention for rheumatoid arthritis: what is the evidence? Rheumatology, November 1, 2001; 40(11): 1211 - 1220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L M A Jansen, I E van der Horst-Bruinsma, D van Schaardenburg, P D Bezemer, and B A C Dijkmans Predictors of radiographic joint damage in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis Ann Rheum Dis, October 1, 2001; 60(10): 924 - 927. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Rozenfeld, L. Chagan, and E. Kleyman The Year in Review: Rheumatology Journal of Pharmacy Practice, February 1, 2001; 14(1): 54 - 69. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |