Ann Rheum Dis

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sakai, T
Right arrow Articles by Ohzono, K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sakai, T
Right arrow Articles by Ohzono, K
Ann Rheum Dis 2001;60:14-20 ( January )

Extended report

Bone scintigraphy for osteonecrosis of the knee in patients with non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging T Sakai, N Sugano, T Nishii, K Haraguchi, H Yoshikawa, K Ohzono

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka University Medical School, Osaka, Japan

Correspondence to: Dr T Sakai, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka University Medical School, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, 565-0871, Osaka, Japan tsakai{at}ort.med.osaka-u.ac.jp

Accepted for publication 18 May 2000

OBJECTIVE---To determine whether technetium bone scintigraphy (BS) is useful for screening of non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the knee (ONK), which was a major affected site, secondary to the femoral head, among multiple osteonecrosis, in patients with non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH).
METHODS---A total of 214 knee joints in 107 patients with ONFH were evaluated by BS and a comparison made with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). ONK was classified into five sites, including the femoral condyles (ONFC), distal femoral metaphysis (ONFM), tibial plateau (ONTP), proximal tibial metaphysis (ONTM), and patella (ONP).
RESULTS---Based on the diagnosis by MRI, ONK was detected in 103 knees of 62 patients (48%). ONFC was most common (86 knees, 40%), ONFM (15%), followed by ONTM (10%), ONP (3%), and ONTP (0.9%). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of BS for ONFC detection were 63%, 71%, and 68%, respectively. When the ONFC lesions on the coronal views of MRI were large or medium sized and occupied two thirds, or the entire anteroposterior joint surface on the sagittal views, the sensitivity of BS for ONFC detection increased to 89% (34/38 knees). The sensitivity of BS for ONFM, ONTM, and ONP detection was 3%, 0%, and 0%, respectively, but these lesions showed a low likelihood of collapse.
CONCLUSION---BS is useful for screening large ONK in patients with ONFH given that 89% of patients with ONFC who had a high risk of collapse of the knee were identified.


© 2001 by Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2001 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & European League Against Rheumatism